Cases 11 - 20 of 64
Sims v. Oliver et al
as 1:2022cv01550
Petitioner:
Roderick Sims
Respondent:
Ms. Oliver, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and J. Shapiro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. FALVEY et al
as 3:2022cv05861
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN FALVEY, LT . EIGENRAUNCH, JAMES RUSSO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roderick Sims v. Superintendent Albion SCI, et al
as 22-2404
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODERICK SIMS
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY UNION COUNTY
MAJETTE v. HICKS et al
as 2:2022cv01944
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MAJETTE
Defendant:
MARCUS HICKS, VICTORIA L. KUHN, PATRICK NOGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. Clark et al
as 1:2020cv02246
Respondent:
Bruce Beemer and Michael Clark
Petitioner:
Roderick Sims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MUSLIM v. STANZIONE et al
as 2:2020cv15669
Defendant:
SHANTAY BRAME ADAMS, DOREEN STANZIONE, MICHAEL HALGELO and others
Plaintiff:
ABDUS MUSLIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. SIMS et al
as 2:2020cv12803
Defendant:
SGT. A. COSTERA, SHANTAY ADAMS, DOREEN STANZIONE and others
Plaintiff:
CLINT WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRUSHACK v. MAIN et al
as 2:2019cv20618
Defendant:
MR. VANPELT, MERRIL MAIN, MARC SIMS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES GRUSHACK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
DURMER et al v. HICKS et al
as 2:2019cv19259
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. BANDA, BRUCE L JENNINGS, JOEL E. DURMER and others
Defendant:
CAROLE JOHNSON, MARCUS O. HICKS, GEORGE ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLADGER v. HICKS et al
as 2:2019cv18867
Defendant:
MARCUS O. HICKS, MR. M. SIMS, DR. MERRILL MAIN and others
Plaintiff:
CHAPPELL TYRONE FLADGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
