Cases 11 - 20 of 20
BOGGS v. SIVERA et al
as 2:2015cv01336
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY K. BOGGS
Defendant:
SIVERA, TERRA, G. ONDREJLKA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOGGS v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2014cv00034
Petitioner:
LEWIS BOGGS
Respondent:
GERALD ROZUM and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MILLER v. DOE et al
as 2:2013cv01520
Plaintiff:
JAHMIL R. MILLER
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, MIKE MOORE, GIFFARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORALES v. THE PUBLIC DEFENDERS OF DELAWARE CO. et al
as 2:2012cv06531
Plaintiff:
HECTOR MORALES
Defendant:
THE PUBLIC DEFENDERS OF DELAWARE CO., STEVEN M. PAPER, PATRICK J. CONNORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURKES v. WALTON et al
as 2:2012cv01236
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN L. BURKES
Defendant:
JOHN WALTON, MELISSA BOGGS, PRISON BOARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boggs v. Bennett et al
as 3:2012cv01657
Plaintiff:
Harry Lee Boggs
Defendant:
Patricia Bennett, May, Bettie Ann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boggs v. York County Prison et al
as 3:2012cv01586
Plaintiff:
Harry Lee Boggs
Defendant:
York County Prison, Doll, Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOGGS v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER C.M. SOSONG et al
as 3:2009cv00106
Plaintiff:
LEWIS BOGGS
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER C.M. SOSONG, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MS. ZIMMERMAN, CORRECTIONAL SERGEANT HOLLANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BOGGS v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2007cv00313
Plaintiff:
GEORGE H. BOGGS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RAYMOND SOBINA, ROBERT MAXA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BOGGS v. JOHN DOE/JANE DOE et al
as 2:2007cv01814
Plaintiff:
LEWIS BOGGS
Defendant:
JOHN DOE/JANE DOE, JULIO M. ALGARIN and WASSER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
