Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Monroe v. Klein et al
as 1:2012cv00723
Plaintiff:
Charles Thomas Monroe
Defendant:
Christopher Klein, Natasha Hollingsworth, Michael Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flonnory v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00995
Plaintiff:
Freddy L. Flonnory
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, David Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. Zeobouty
as 11-3781
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
ZEOBOUTY, GORDON, CHELSIA HICKS and others
Debtor - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER CESSNA
James Biggins v. Green
as 11-3427
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
GREEN, Sergeant, KIESSER, TELB and others
Debtor - Appellee:
CANDY DIBBLE
Biggins v. Zeobouty et al
as 1:2011cv00662
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Zeobouty, Gordon, Chelsia Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Green et al
as 1:2011cv00473
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Green, Kiesser, Telb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waples v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00300
Plaintiff:
Joshua Waples
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, Spence Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Parkell v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 10-4754
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD D. PARKELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, Commissioner of Prisons, in his individual and offical capacities, PERRY PHELPS, in his individual and official capacities, DAVID PIERCE, in his individual and official capacities and others
Parkell v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00412
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, David Pierce and others
Plaintiff:
Donald D. Parkell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Klein v. Hogsten
as 3:2007cv00701
Petitioner:
Christopher Klein
Respondent:
Karen Hogsten and Karen Hogsten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
