Cases 11 - 20 of 38
MILLS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv05986
Plaintiff:
JEROME MILLS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv05905
Plaintiff:
BOBBY RICHARDSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv00008
Plaintiff:
JAMIL HARRIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, GIORLA, GAINEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2012cv05550
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, CLYDE GAINEY and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sollog Adonai-Adoni v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 12-3606
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOLLOG IMMANUEL ADONAI-ADONI
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, CAULK and others
ACOSTA v. DELANEY et al
as 2:2012cv05078
Plaintiff:
FRANK ACOSTA
Defendant:
JOHN P. DELANEY, LOUIS GIORLA, CLYDE GAINEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARRASQUILLO v. DOE et al
as 2:2012cv01372
Defendant:
LORENZO NORTH, CLYDE D. GAINEY, JOHN P. DELANEY and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE A CARRASQUILLO, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOOD v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv06954
Plaintiff:
MCKINLEY WOOD
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. GAINEY
as 2:2010cv05685
Plaintiff:
STANLEY JOHNSON
Defendant:
CLYDE D. GAINEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2010cv02752
Plaintiff:
WALLACE JONES
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM and CLYDE GAINEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
