Cases 11 - 20 of 81
MOTA v. LOVERIDGE et al
as 2:2023cv01482
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO MOTA
Defendant:
LESLIE LOVERIDGE, ELAL CARDE, CAPT. MILLARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MOTA v. LOVERIDGE et al
as 2:2023cv03140
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO MOTA
Defendant:
LESLIE LOVERIDGE, ELAL CARDE, CAPT. MILLARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EASLEY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2023cv01718
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASLEY
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, George Little, Secretary of Department of Corrections, TABE BICKELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Jamison
as 1:2023cv00255
Petitioner:
Andre Hamilton
Respondent:
Warden Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HAMILTON v. MASON et al
as 2:2023cv00309
Petitioner:
DAQUAN HAMILTON
Respondent:
BERNADETTE MASON, KEVIIN STEELE and JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAMILTON v. KLINEFELETER
as 2:2023cv00232
Petitioner:
ZAKEE HAMILTON
Respondent:
SCOTT KLINEFELETER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DILTS v. BROWN et al
as 2:2022cv01755
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER A. DILTS
Defendant:
C/O BOB BROWN, C/O RESTLER, SGT. STEVE ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGILL v. SIMPSON et al
as 3:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
HIRAM MCGILL
Defendant:
ERIC SIMPSON and LORI HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMILTON v. SMITH et al
as 2:2022cv01755
Petitioner:
ZAKEE HAMILTON
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCGILL v. BROWN et al
as 2:2022cv00598
Plaintiff:
HIRAM MCGILL
Defendant:
CHESTER BROWN, ERIC SIMPSON, LORI HAMILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
