Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Travillion v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv02075
Plaintiff:
Jamar L. Travillion
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #4, John/Jane Doe #1, Mr. FNU Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOUSE v. SMITH et al
as 2:2018cv04283
Defendant:
DEVON SMITH, JANE DOE #1, SHARON HILL FAMILY DOLLAR, CORPORATION, ESTABLISHMENT(S) and others
Plaintiff:
JUAN HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv01827
Plaintiff:
Denise Dixon
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, John E. Wetzel, Robert Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2017cv01591
Plaintiff:
Anthony Phillips
Defendant:
Kerestes, Beggs, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv03276
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. EVANS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA, DEFENDERS ASSOCIATION OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS v. MERCY SUBURBAN HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2016cv03426
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. EVANS
Defendant:
MERCY SUBURBAN HOSPITAL, TOWNE MANOR EAST NURSING HOME & REHABILITATION CENTER, MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cabrera v. Clark et al
as 1:2016cv00392
Plaintiff:
Jose Emmanuel Ortiz Cabrera
Defendant:
Michael Smith, Jane Doe, Jane Doe (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Harry et al
as 3:2015cv02469
Plaintiff:
Jason Parker
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, John E. Wetzel, James Meintel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2015cv00457
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL JACKSON
Defendant:
LOUIS FOLINO, JOHN DOE # 1, JOHN DOE # 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOKINDA v. JIN et al
as 2:2015cv00179
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
BYUNGHAK JIN, MICHELLE DIGGS, IRMA VIHLIDAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
