Cases 11 - 20 of 41
CREDICO v. PROTHONOTARY OF COMMONWEALTH COURT et al
as 2:2016cv04704
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN CREDICO
Defendant:
PROTHONOTARY OF COMMONWEALTH COURT, UKNOWN PERSONS OF COMMONWEALTH COURT and COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. PERSON et al
as 2:2016cv03552
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
JOHN PERSON and SUPREME COURT OF PENN.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COMSTOCK et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2015cv05611
Plaintiff:
BRANDON JAMES COMSTOCK, BRANDON J. COMSTOCK and BRANDON COMSTOCK
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, JAILS, INSTITUTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERSONS v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2015cv05075
Petitioner:
RANDY PERSONS
Respondent:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, GIORLA and FARREL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JONES v. CAMERON et al
as 3:2015cv00217
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JONES
Defendant:
KENNETH CAMERON, NAJI, DEBRA YOUNKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERSONS v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2015cv04298
Plaintiff:
RANDY PERSONS
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, LOUIS GIORLA, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2015cv01394
Plaintiff:
Aaron Thompson
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Bureau of Prisons, R. A. PURDUE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JONES v. CAMERON et al
as 2:2015cv03713
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JONES
Defendant:
KENNETH CAMERON, NAJI, DEBRA YOUNKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2015cv00714
Plaintiff:
AARON THOMPSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, R. A. PURDUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURNER v. HOLDER et al
as 3:2014cv00258
Plaintiff:
DONALD TURNER
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., MARK KIRBY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
