Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
JOHNSON v. HOFFMAN HALL et al
as 2:2011cv00297
Plaintiff: ANTHONY JOHNSON
Defendant: HOFFMAN HALL and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. HOFFMAN HALL C.E.C.
as 2:2010cv07436
Plaintiff: ANTHONY JOHNSON
Defendant: HOFFMAN HALL C.E.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. C.F.C.F.
as 2:2010cv05093
Plaintiff: ANTHONY JOHNSON
Defendant: C.F.C.F.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. BRITTON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00990
Petitioner: ANTHONY JOHNSON
Respondent: RANDALL E. BRITTON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. District Attorney of the County of York et al
as 1:2009cv01454
Petitioner: Winston Anthony Johnson, II
Respondent: District Attorney of the County of York, Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania and David Diguglielmo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv04153
Petitioner: ROGER ANTHONY JOHNSON
Respondent: MICHAEL CHERTOFF and SCOTT WEBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv02691
Petitioner: ROGER ANTHONY JOHNSON
Respondent: MICHEAL CHERTOFF, SCOTT WEBER and OSCAR AVILEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI-HUNTINGDON et al
as 2:2007cv01249
Petitioner: ANTHONY JOHNSON
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI-HUNTINGDON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?