Cases 21 - 30 of 119
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv00086
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
AMOS ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Winter v. Metzger et al
as 1:2019cv00507
Plaintiff:
Hermione Kelly Ivy Winter, David Allen Allemandi and Najmaa-bint-Sakinah S. bint-Sard-Khadijah
Defendant:
Officer Marshall Hobbs, Officer Katrina Burley, Captain Tony Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KAMMERDIENER v. ARMSTRONG COUNTY et al
as 2:2018cv01484
Defendant:
ERIKA KIRKPATRICK, ARMSTRONG COUNTY, PHILLIP SHAFFER and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD E. KAMMERDIENER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Draper et al v. The United States of America
as 1:2018cv01578
Plaintiff:
Danny Armstrong, Cleve BIllings, Ernest Mocado and others
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARMSTRONG v. MAHALLAY et al
as 2:2018cv04256
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA and LAWRENCE MAHALLAY
Petitioner:
RAYMOND ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ARMSTRONG v. LUTHER et al
as 3:2018cv00086
Petitioner:
JEROME ARMSTRONG
Respondent:
JAMEY P. LUTHER and JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ARMSTRONG v. SUESSER et al
as 1:2017cv00265
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
SUESSER, DELANEY and BARBER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARMSTRONG v. DIRAIMO et al
as 1:2017cv00237
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
DIRAIMO, ROTH and ABRAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIEHL-ARMSTRONG et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv00224
Petitioner:
MARJORIE DIEHL-ARMSTRONG and MARK MARVIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
KAMMERDEINER v. CLARK et al
as 2:2017cv00808
Petitioner:
KEITH L. KAMMERDEINER
Respondent:
MICHAEL CLARK, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ARMSTRONG COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
