Cases 21 - 30 of 108
DeJesus v. Stinehart et al
as 4:2021cv01639
Plaintiff:
Alejandro DeJesus
Defendant:
John Stinehart, Courtney Rodgers, Jenna Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erskine v. James T. Vaughn Correctional Center C/O Dennis et al
as 1:2021cv01016
Plaintiff:
Justin Erskine
Defendant:
James T. Vaughn Correctional Center C/O Dennis, J.T.V.C.C Cpl Amari Brooks-Coleman, J.T.V.C.C Lt. Kevin Lorick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDREWS v. CORRECTION OFFICER DEJESUS
as 2:2021cv02160
Defendant:
CORRECTION OFFICER DEJESUS
Plaintiff:
AARON ANDREWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v May, et al.
as 1:2021cv00365
Defendant:
Officer Hansen, Lieutenant DeJesus, Warden Robert May and others
Plaintiff:
Judeau S. Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeJesus v. Warden of SCI-Mahanoy et al
as 2:2021cv00852
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and Warden of SCI-Mahanoy
Petitioner:
ALEJANDRO DEJESUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DeJesus v. Warden of SCI-Mahanoy et al
as 4:2021cv00303
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Warden of SCI-Mahanoy
Petitioner:
Alejandro DeJesus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Maddux v. Atherholt et al
as 1:2021cv00138
Defendant:
Lt. Justin Atherholt, Warden Robert May, Staff Lt. Orlando DeJesus and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Maddux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erskine v. Delaware Department of Corrections (DDOC) et al
as 1:2020cv01771
Plaintiff:
Justin Erskine
Defendant:
J.T.V.C.C S.Lt Orlando DeJesus, James T. Vaughn Correctional Center C/O Dennis, J.T.V.C.C Lt Heishman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MELENDEZ v. ANDERSON
as 2:2020cv13232
Petitioner:
MANUEL DEJESUS MELENDEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM J. ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DEJESUS-LOZADA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv02944
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
FELIX DEJESUS-LOZADA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
