Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Binkley v. Rendell et al
as 1:2010cv01245
Plaintiff:
Terry Binkley
Defendant:
Edward Rendell, Jeffrey A Beard, Dorina Varner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM MENU et al
as 2:2010cv01771
Plaintiff:
JERRY K LAWSON
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM MENU and KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK SALES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TILLMAN v. KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK SALES et al
as 2:2010cv00255
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK TILLMAN
Defendant:
KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK SALES and JAMES DOLHI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LAWSON v. PHILA PRISON SYSTEM COMMISSARY et al
as 2:2010cv00169
Plaintiff:
JERRY K. LAWSON
Defendant:
PHILA PRISON SYSTEM COMMISSARY, KEEFE SUPPLY COMPANY and E.Z. DIGBY'S HEALTH MIX PACKING FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TILLMAN v. KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK SALES et al
as 2:2009cv01527
Plaintiff:
JOHN TILLMAN
Defendant:
KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK SALES and JAMES DOLHI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Carpenter v. Klopotoski et al
as 1:2008cv02233
Plaintiff:
Philip Carpenter
Defendant:
Superintendent Klopotoski, Nurse Irene, P.A. O'Brian and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Snack Legends et al
as 4:2008cv01575
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Smith
Defendant:
Snack Legends, Keefe Supply Co, Centric Store and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Smith v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2007cv01079
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Smith
Defendant:
United States Of America, Centric Store, Snack Legends and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HOPKINS v. KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK SALES et al
as 2:2007cv00745
Plaintiff:
WILLARD HAROLD HOPKINS
Defendant:
KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK SALES and ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
