Cases 21 - 30 of 57
MCCALL et al v. CFCF STAET PRISION
as 2:2011cv05110
Plaintiff:
PURNELL MCCALL, OMAR TERNER and MELVIN LOVETT
Defendant:
CFCF STAET PRISION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derrick Brown v. David Kustoff, et al
as 11-2793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID KUSTOFF, EDWARD L. STANTON, III, STATE OF TENNESSEE and others
Derrick Brown v. State of Tennessee, et al
as 11-2751
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, SHELBY COUNTY GOVERNMENT, CITY OF MEMPHIS and others
Brown v. Kustoff et al
as 3:2011cv01148
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Defendant:
David Kustoff, Edward L Stanton, III, State of Tennessee and others
Amicu:
Shelby Count Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2011cv01130
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Shelby County Government, City of Memphis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCCALL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2011cv02628
Plaintiff:
AARON MCCALL
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: Bill of Lading Act 42.29 U.S.C. APP (1988 ED.) 122
Bondary McCall, et al v. NFN Martinez, et al
as 11-1788
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BONDARY MCCALL
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
VAUGHN J. CURTIS, WILLIE BROWN, EDMOND GASAWAY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NFN MARTINEZ, DAVID EBBERT, NFN DEWALD and others
MCCALL et al v. STATE PRISON SYSTEM OF PHILADELPHIA, PA
as 2:2011cv01397
Plaintiff:
PURNELL MCCALL, OMAR TERNER and MELVIN LOVETT
Defendant:
STATE PRISON SYSTEM OF PHILADELPHIA, PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TERNER et al v. C.F.C.F.
as 2:2011cv00313
Plaintiff:
OMAR TERNER, MELVIN LOVETT and PURNELL MCCALL
Defendant:
C.F.C.F.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURNER et al v. C.F.C.F.
as 2:2011cv00046
Plaintiff:
OMAR TURNER, PERNELL MCCALL and MELVIN LOVETT
Defendant:
C.F.C.F.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
