Cases 21 - 30 of 154
Perez v. Sage
as 1:2022cv01028
Petitioner:
Efrain Perez
Respondent:
Warden Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vasquez v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv00813
Plaintiff:
Noe S. Perez Vasquez
Defendant:
United States, J. Meyers, National Gang Unit Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
OCHOA-PEREZ v. QUEEN
as 3:2022cv00081
Petitioner:
RAUL OCHOA-PEREZ
Respondent:
QUEEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
PEREZ v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2022cv00493
Plaintiff:
ALBERT PEREZ
Defendant:
MR. JOHN E. WETZEL, MR. JAIME SORBER and JANE/JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Warden of SCI-Huntingdon et al
as 3:2022cv00055
Petitioner:
Terrance Xavier Perez
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Huntingdon and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PEREZ v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv04796
Plaintiff:
ALBERT PEREZ
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL and PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BADGER v. PEREZ et al
as 5:2021cv04747
Plaintiff:
PETER BADGER
Defendant:
JUSTIN PEREZ, DENNIS RIVAS, MATTHEW BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Brittain, et al
as 3:2021cv01039
Petitioner:
Juan Jose Perez
Respondent:
Kathy Brittain and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PEREZ v. SCI FAYETTE SUPERINTENDANT JOHN/JANE DOE et al
as 2:2021cv00332
Defendant:
CITY OF LABELLE PENNSYLVANIA, JAMES BARNACLE, ANY AND ALL JOHN/JANE DOE DEFENDANTS SCI FAYETTE and others
Plaintiff:
PERCY PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Perez v. Lackawanna County Prison et al
as 3:2021cv00292
Defendant:
Coleen Orzel, The Dentist, Derek Lavelle and others
Plaintiff:
Joan Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
