Cases 21 - 30 of 583
MIDDLEBROOKS v. SALCEDO et al
as 2:2023cv21601
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS MIDDLEBROOKS
Defendant:
K. SALCEDO, J WATKINS, RAYMOND RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AGANAN et al v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 2:2023cv21410
Plaintiff:
RIZZA JANE GUANAO AGANAN, ALBERT BOAMPONG, HECTOR GARCIA MENDOZA and others
Defendant:
ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ, JOHN TSOUKARIS, MATTHEW ALBENCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BARAJAS v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv20101
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ BARAJAS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rodriguez v. USA
as 1:2023cv01638
Petitioner:
Elmer Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Angel Rodriguez
as 23-2395
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANGEL RODRIGUEZ
Davis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2023cv01202
Plaintiff:
Iklas R. Davis
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Staff of FCI-Schuylkill, Warden Beth Rickard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
RODRIGUEZ v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv03682
Petitioner:
HUMBERTO ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BABAYOFF v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2023cv03644
Plaintiff:
YAIR ISRAEL BABAYOFF
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TOMS RIVER TOWNSHIP, RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DE JESUS-RODRIGUEZ v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv03609
Petitioner:
SATURNINO DE JESUS-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RODRIGUEZ-LOPEZ v. WARDEN FCI FT. DIX NJ
as 1:2023cv04164
Petitioner:
YEFFERSON RODRIGUEZ-LOPEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI FT. DIX NJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
