Cases 31 - 40 of 50,219
ALEXANDER v. SUPERINTENDENT BROTHERS et al
as 2:2024cv00717
Petitioner:
KAREEM-LATEEF ALEXANDER
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT BROTHERS and PA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CARTER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv02111
Plaintiff:
DARIUS CARTER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Stockton v. Little et al
as 1:2024cv00802
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Defendant:
George Little, John Wetzel, Thomas McGinley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. SUPERINTENDENT CLOSE OF SCI HOUTZDALE
as 2:2024cv02018
Petitioner:
LEROY WILSON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT CLOSE OF SCI HOUTZDALE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SIMS et al v. HARRY
as 2:2024cv02030
Plaintiff:
AARON V. SIMS and DURELL H. COTTON, JR.
Defendant:
DR. LAUREL R. HARRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williamson v. Wertz et al
as 1:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Bobby Kenneth Williamson
Defendant:
R. Wertz, C. Banks, R. Kyler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cicchiello v. Warden Briggs et al
as 3:2024cv00475
Petitioner:
Joan Cicchiello
Respondent:
Warden Briggs and Pennsylvania Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cooper v. Prince et al
as 4:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Bruce X. Cooper
Defendant:
Scott Prince and Mark Abel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
IN RE: TUNSIL
as 2:2024cv01262
Plaintiff:
BARRETT S. TUNSIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayko v. USA
as 1:2024cv00798
Petitioner:
Florentina Mayko
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
