Cases 41 - 50 of 170
COLON v. FERGUSON et al
as 5:2019cv03475
Petitioner:
PEDRO COLON
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH and TAMMY FERGUSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MOORE v. COLON et al
as 2:2019cv15379
Defendant:
SGT JOHN POMPONIO, G SANTANA, N STANICKI and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colon v. Clark
as 3:2019cv00582
Respondent:
PA State Attorney General and Superintendent Michael Clark
Petitioner:
Hector David Colon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodriguez-Colon v. York County Prison et al
as 1:2019cv00030
Plaintiff:
Fernandino Rodriguez-Colon
Defendant:
Clair Doll, Adam Ogle and York County Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLON v. MCGINLEY et al
as 2:2018cv01888
Petitioner:
EDDY COLON
Respondent:
TOM MCGINLEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COLON-ROQUE v. HAINSWORTH et al
as 5:2018cv01745
Petitioner:
LUIS OMAR COLON-ROQUE
Respondent:
MELISSA HAINSWORTH and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Colon v. Kenwell et al
as 1:2018cv00840
Plaintiff:
Adam Colon
Defendant:
April Kenwell, Laurel Harry , PA Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colon-Roque v. Hainsworth et al
as 3:2018cv00730
Petitioner:
Luis Omar Colon-Roque
Respondent:
Melissa Hainsworth and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COLON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2017cv05523
Plaintiff:
LUIS A COLON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ARROYO v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2017cv02667
Plaintiff:
JORGE LUIS ARROYO
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DAVID PENCHISEN, DANIEL S. KEEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
