Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Donahue v. Olexa
as 3:2013cv01071
Plaintiff:
Sean M Donahue
Defendant:
Ed Olexa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donahue v. Kachmarski et al
as 3:2013cv01043
Plaintiff:
Sean M Donahue
Defendant:
Allison Kachmarski, George R Zaiser, PA State Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHERRY v. COLE et al
as 1:2013cv02144
Petitioner:
BENJAMIN J. WHERRY, SR.
Respondent:
COLE, FCI FORT DIX, DONAHUE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Frank Dippolito v. USA, et al
as 12-4446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK DIPPOLITO
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
ODOM v. DONAHUE et al
as 2:2012cv06838
Plaintiff:
RAFORT ODOM
Defendant:
EUGENE DONAHUE, THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA 1ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT and SEMEION HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CIRAOLO v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2012cv07159
Petitioner:
EUGENE CIRAOLO
Respondent:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., J.L. NORWOOD, JORDAN HOLLINGSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FARUQ v. MCCOLLUM et al
as 1:2011cv05987
Plaintiff:
KARIM FARUQ
Defendant:
MARY MCCOLLUM, D. SCHAAF and ROBERT DONAHUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KITCHEN v. GRONDOLSKY et al
as 1:2011cv05834
Plaintiff:
JAMES MICHAEL KITCHEN
Defendant:
JEFF GRONDOLSKY, DONNA ZICKEFOOSE, ROBERT DONAHUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv04951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks et al v. Sutierland et al
as 1:2011cv01551
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Damion Black
Defendant:
AW Sutierland, Donahue, Donna Zicketoose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
