Cases 41 - 50 of 273
DIPANFILO, JR. v. SUPERINTENDENT MOONEY et al
as 2:2018cv01690
Petitioner:
JUSTIN JOHN DIPANFILO, JR.
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT MOONEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CARSON v. MOONEY et al
as 2:2018cv01603
Petitioner:
GEORGE CARSON
Respondent:
VINCE MOONEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LUZERNE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Snider v. McKeehan et al
as 4:2018cv00801
Plaintiff:
Joel Snider
Defendant:
McKeehan, Nichtman, Jennifer Herrold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parchinski v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2018cv00700
Plaintiff:
Shannon Marie Parchinski
Defendant:
Lackawanna County , Vincent Mooney , Robert McMillen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSADO v. JANE DOE (LAW LIBRIAN) et al
as 3:2018cv00601
Plaintiff:
GERONIMO FRATICELLI ROSADO, JR.
Defendant:
JANE DOE (LAW LIBRIAN), Mooney , Goyne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2018cv00131
Plaintiff:
Mark Smith
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Vincent E. Mooney and Melissa Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Mooney et al
as 4:2017cv02342
Plaintiff:
Easkon Walker
Defendant:
Vincent Mooney, S. Miller and Lisa Bolka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDavis v. Mahally et al
as 3:2017cv02119
Plaintiff:
Jerome McDavis
Defendant:
Mahally, Mooney and Demmins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUNST v. MOONEY et al
as 5:2017cv04415
Petitioner:
DARRYL DUNST
Respondent:
MOONEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FOLEY v. MOONEY et al
as 2:2017cv01260
Petitioner:
KEVIN JAMES FOLEY
Respondent:
MOONEY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
