Cases 41 - 50 of 176
GEORGE v. SMOCK et al
as 1:2020cv00320
Defendant:
PA STROUP, MS. JERI SMOCK, CHCA, MICHAEL CLARK and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EARL GEORGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MCRAE v. PIERSON et al
as 1:2020cv00318
Defendant:
HEARING EXAMINER R. SZELEWSKI, SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL CLARK and SGT. K. PIERSON
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MCRAE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WARING v. CLARK et al
as 2:2020cv05494
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL CLARK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
MACEO EMERSON WARING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MADISON v. CLARK et al
as 2:2020cv01655
Respondent:
STEPHEN P. STEINER, JOHN WETZEL, PAROLE AGENT DAREK EBERHARDT and others
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE J. MADISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CALLAHAN v. CLARK et al
as 1:2020cv00305
Defendant:
MORGAN OLIVER, JANE DOE, MICHAEL RILEY and others
Plaintiff:
VARIAN C. CALLAHAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CORBETT v. CLARK et al
as 2:2020cv04527
Petitioner:
BURL NEIL CORBETT
Respondent:
ESQ. MICHAEL CLARK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MILLER v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2020cv00234
Plaintiff:
DARREN L. MILLER
Defendant:
PAUL ENNIS, JOHN WETZEL, LT. BEDNARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
James v. CLARK, et al.
as 2:2020cv03805
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and MICHAEL CLARK
Petitioner:
Leeverne James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. NYBERG et al
as 1:2020cv00208
Defendant:
R. ROSCINSKI, CO HARMON, CINDY CLARK and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN L. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CORBETT v. CLARK et al
as 1:2020cv00102
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHAEL CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS
Petitioner:
BURL NEIL CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
