Cases 41 - 50 of 59
NELSON v. QUIGLEY et al
as 5:2015cv04670
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE LENAN NELSON
Defendant:
JANINE L. QUIGLEY, JEFFREY R. SMITH, PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephen Smith v. Maiorana, et al
as 15-2591
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN R. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN MAIORANA, MR. WRIGHT, DR. FARKUS, DMP and others
Tyrell Hines v. Joseph Stauffer, et al
as 15-2543
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRELL TAYLOR HINES
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH R. STAUFFER, Prosecutor, CHRISTOPHER CRUZ, Detective Supervisor, JOHN GILL, Lead Detective and others
CRESPO v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2015cv02641
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. CRESPO
Defendant:
BETH A. DANIELS, MELISA ARRIETA, ARIANNA P. BARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HINES v. JOHN DOE et al
as 5:2015cv02628
Plaintiff:
TYRELL TAYLOR HINES
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, JOSEPH R. STAUFFER, CHRISTOPHER CRUZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephen Smith v. Warden Maiorana, et al
as 14-4124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN R. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN MAIORANA, WRIGHT, DR. FARKUS, DMP and others
Roger Etkins v. Judy Glenn, et al
as 13-1253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER ANTHONY ETKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDY GLENN, R. SMITH and ERIC ASP
Roger Etkins v. Judy Glenn, et al
as 12-2525
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER ANTHONY ETKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDY GLENN, R. SMITH and ERIC
James Smith v. George Hayman, et al
as 12-2203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES R. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE HAYMAN, Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Corrections (NJDOC), MICHELLE RICCI, Administrator of New Jersey State Prison (NJSP), RUSTY REEVES, Doctor, Director of Psychiatry and others
James Smith v. Michelle Ricci, et al
as 11-2521
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES R. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE RICCI, Administrator of New Jersey State Prison and PAULA DOW, The Attorney General of the State of New Jersey
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
