Cases 41 - 50 of 92
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00548
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
WRAY v. I.C.E. et al
as 2:2009cv00481
Plaintiff:
LENFORD P. WRAY
Defendant:
I.C.E., SCOTT WEBER, OSCAR AVILES and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
RODRIGUEZ v. WEBER et al
as 2:2009cv00465
Petitioner:
ARCADIO MARTINEZ RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
SCOTT WEBER, IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, JANET NAPOLITIANO and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ANDERSON v. MCGUIRE et al
as 2:2009cv00340
Petitioner:
GARY PATRICK ANDERSON
Respondent:
LEO P. MCGUIRE, SCOTT WEBER, CHRISTOPHER SHANAHAN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
WRAY v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008cv06042
Petitioner:
LENFORD P. WRAY
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, SCOTT WEBER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MENEZES v. WEBER
as 2:2008cv05698
Petitioner:
RAFAEL LINO MENEZES
Respondent:
SCOTT WEBER
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
PLUBPLUNG v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv05699
Petitioner:
TIRAYUTN PLUBPLUNG
Respondent:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, SCOTT WEBER and OSCAR AVILEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SALEH v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT et al
as 2:2008cv04441
Petitioner:
HASSAN AHMED SALEH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Dhanna Singh v. Edmond Cicchi, et al
as 08-3436
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DHANNA SINGH, AKA Dhanvir Toora
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTY GEN USA, DIR BCIS, JULIE L. MYERS and others
DESAI v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008cv04066
Plaintiff:
UTPAL DESAI
Defendant:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, SCOTT WEBER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
