Cases 51 - 60 of 131
LOVE v. CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK et al
as 3:2016cv02586
Plaintiff:
LEMONT LOVE
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPARTMENT, MIDDLESEX COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2016cv00372
Plaintiff:
Joshua I Payne
Defendant:
John Kerestes, Hugh Beggs, Jeanne Macknight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOPER v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2016cv00549
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY L. COOPER
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, FRANK GREEN, GRIFFITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeJesus v. Carey et al
as 3:2015cv02504
Plaintiff:
Luis DeJesus
Defendant:
C.O. Carey, Superintendent Tritt, Dorina Varner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANN v. US PENITENTIARY - CANAAN et al
as 1:2015cv02212
Plaintiff:
RANDEEP SINGH MANN
Defendant:
US PENITENTIARY - CANAAN, Ebbert, Burkett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. HAVERFORD TWP POLICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2015cv04850
Plaintiff:
PETER WALKER
Defendant:
HAVERFORD TWP POLICE DEPT., THOMAS F. SCARPATO, JR., JEFFREY STEIGEWALT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pino v. Carey et al
as 1:2015cv01172
Plaintiff:
John A. Pino
Defendant:
Michael F. Carey, Christopher Hand, Bradon Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOVE v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2015cv03681
Plaintiff:
LEMONT LOVE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STEVEN JOHNSON, MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carey v. USA
as 1:2014cv01974
Plaintiff:
Damon Todd Carey
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jones v. Muccino et al
as 3:2014cv01477
Plaintiff:
Robert X Jones
Defendant:
Muccino, John Tustin, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
