Cases 51 - 60 of 77
Christopher Reed v. Craig Harpster, et al
as 12-3212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM REED
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG HARPSTER, Unit Manager, JEFFERY ROCKOVAN, Grievance Coordinator, JAMES D. MORRIS, Major and others
COWDER v. THOMPSON et al
as 3:2012cv00109
Petitioner:
MARK COWDER
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON , CLEARFIELD COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Welch v. Thompson
as 3:2012cv00933
Petitioner:
James Welch
Respondent:
Brian Thompson and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Luis Alamo, et al v. Marirosa Lamas, et al
as 12-2134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUIS E. ALAMO and RITA C. SABELLI-ALAMO
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIROSA LAMAS, BRIAN THOMPSON, ROBERT MARSH and others
Fakhouri v. Thompson et al
as 1:2012cv00756
Petitioner:
Zouheir Saul Fakhouri
Respondent:
Brian Thompson, Bruce Disarro and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RICHARDSON v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2012cv01238
Petitioner:
DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Craig McDaniels v. Brian Thompson, et al
as 12-1374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG MCDANIELS
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC R. LINHARDT, BRIAN THOMPSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
KEMP v. THOMPSON
as 2:2012cv00099
Petitioner:
ALONZO KEMP
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
DAVIS v. THOMPSON
as 2:2012cv00061
Petitioner:
THOMAS DAVIS
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dierolf v. Thompson et al
as 1:2011cv01999
Petitioner:
William H. Dierolf, IV
Respondent:
Brian Thompson and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
