Cases 51 - 60 of 65
Robert Oleson v. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 10-3650
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT R. OLESON
Defendant - Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, SPALDING, Mr., BROWN, Ms. and others
DONAHUE v. SOUDERS et al
as 2:2010cv02761
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER DONAHUE
Respondent:
SOUDERS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TROWELL v. SOUTH et al
as 2:2010cv02599
Plaintiff:
SALAHDIN TROWELL
Defendant:
JAMES DEAN SOUTH, I. MARCO RODRIGUEZ, F.J. LARAWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GATSON et al v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2010cv01473
Plaintiff:
DANIEL GATSON and JERRY MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COUNTY OF BERGEN, NJ, OFFICE OF THE BERGEN COUNTY PROSECUTORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Pearsall, et al
as 10-1491
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMMIE LEWIS, a/k/a Emmanuel E. Elder
Defendant - Appellee:
NANCY PEARSALL, ANDREW DONAHUE, CHARLOTTE SELIG and others
Damien Donahue v. J. Grondolsky
as 10-1147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMIEN STEPHEN DONAHUE
Defendant - Appellee:
J. GRONDOLSKY
OLESON v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv05706
Plaintiff:
ROBERT R. OLESON
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, SPALDING, BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pettiford v. Tyrrell et al
as 1:2009cv00359
Plaintiff:
DeAndre R. Pettiford
Defendant:
Daniel F. Tyrrell, Jr. and John W. Donahue IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DONAHUE v. GRONDOLSKY
as 3:2008cv05560
Petitioner:
DAMIEN STEPHEN DONAHUE
Respondent:
J. GRONDOLSKY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DONAHUE v. GRONDOLSKY
as 1:2008cv05533
Petitioner:
DAMIEN STEPHEN DONAHUE
Respondent:
J. GRONDOLSKY
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
