Cases 51 - 60 of 301
SLACKFORD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv17769
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SLACKFORD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DR. LIMBERKAR, DR. S. MCGANN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VELASQUEZ v. MINTZ et al
as 3:2021cv01659
Plaintiff:
Moses Velasquez
Defendant:
TINA MINTZ, Timothy Fierro, Juan Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VELASQUEZ v. LITZ et al
as 3:2021cv01658
Petitioner:
Moses Velasquez
Respondent:
Tina M. Litz, Timothy Fierro, Juan Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
VELASQUEZ v. MINTZ et al
as 2:2021cv04159
Plaintiff:
MOSES VELASQUEZ
Defendant:
TINA MINTZ, TIMOTHY FIERRO, JUAN LOPEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VELASQUEZ v. LITZ et al
as 2:2021cv04162
Petitioner:
MOSES VELASQUEZ
Respondent:
TINA M. LITZ, TIMOTHY FIERRO, JUAN LOPEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ECHEVARRIA v. COUNTY OF ESSEX et al
as 2:2021cv16609
Plaintiff:
MOISES ECHEVARRIA
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ESSEX, ESSEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ESSEX COUNTY ADULT CORRECTIONS CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ANDERSON et al v. LEHIGH COUNTY PRISON et al
as 5:2021cv03620
Plaintiff:
DONTAIE ANDERSON, JAWON H. JOHNSON, KAMAR THOMPSON and others
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY PRISON, KYLE RUSSEL, JANINE DONATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2021cv03353
Petitioner:
GABRIEL MARTIN LOPEZ
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MUATA et al v. HICKS et al
as 2:2021cv13033
Defendant:
CITY OF RAHWAY NEW JERSEY, MARCUS O. HICKS and JAMES SLAUGHTER
Plaintiff:
KOJO MUATA, RONALD ROBBINS and CARLOS LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cummings v. Schickvam et al
as 1:2021cv01006
Defendant:
D. Drum, Dr. Chuma, Powers and others
Plaintiff:
William Brandon Cummings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
