Cases 51 - 60 of 129
Gell v. Sabol et al
as 3:2011cv01423
Petitioner:
Francisco Antonio Gell
Respondent:
Mary Sabol , York County Prison , Thomas Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hernandez v. Sabol et al
as 1:2011cv01064
Petitioner:
Sandy R. Hernandez
Respondent:
Mary E. Sabol , The Department of Homeland Security , Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Diaz-Cabrera v. Sabol et al
as 1:2011cv01065
Petitioner:
Alexander Jose Diaz-Cabrera
Respondent:
Mary E. Sabol , The Department of Homeland Security , Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-2090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
AYODELE v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2011cv01927
Petitioner:
OLUSEGUN BEXLEY AYODELE
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER, JANET NAPOLITANO, THOMAS DECKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Peguero v. Sabol et al
as 1:2011cv00585
Petitioner:
Julio Peguero
Respondent:
Mary E. Sabol , Thomas Decker , Michael T. Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MANAA v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY OF PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL
as 2:2011cv02019
Respondent:
MAHMOUD MANAA, PAMELA P. COHEN (DEMBE), DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADEPHIA COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Pham v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 1:2011cv00444
Petitioner:
Quoc Pham
Respondent:
Attorney General of the United States, Thomas Doran, Thomas Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Peynado v. Decker et al
as 1:2010cv02669
Plaintiff:
Martin Luther Peynado
Defendant:
Thomas Decker, Joseph Dunn and Michael Zackowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wuol v. Sabol et al
as 3:2010cv02667
Petitioner:
Mat Gatwech Wuol
Respondent:
Mary Sabol , Thomas Decker , John T. Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
