Cases 61 - 70 of 90
Banks et al v. FCI Fort Dix Food Services Department West Compound et al
as 1:2011cv01095
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Damian Black Fox
Defendant:
FCI Fort Dix Food Services Department West Compound, Dougless Williams, Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks et al v. Wagner et al
as 1:2011cv00934
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Damian Black Fox
Defendant:
Wagner, Dixon, Donna Zickefiose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Rudolph Stanko v. Barack Obama, et al
as 11-2154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUDOLPH GEORGE STANKO
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK OBAMA, Commander and Chief (Art. II, Section 2) and DAVID EBBERT, Warden
Banks v. Sager et al
as 1:2011cv00741
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
S. Sager, R & D Department, Fort Dix, NJ CFCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Whitaker et al
as 1:2011cv00669
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
A. Whitaker, Stevens, J. Tenor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Marantz et al
as 1:2011cv01753
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
Marantz, T. Blumm, DONNA ZICKEFOOSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Marantz et al
as 1:2011cv00475
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Marantz, T. Blumm, Donna Zickefoose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Purnell Nelson v. Mayview Mental Health State Ho, et al
as 10-4480
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PURNELL R. NELSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MAYVIEW MENTAL HEALTH STATE HOSPITAL, EDWARD G. RENDELL and BARACK OBAMA
Frederick Rolle v. USA, et al
as 10-3384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK ROLLE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DAVID G. LARIMER, MARION W. PAYSON and others
Defendant - Appellant:
K. M. WHITE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
