Cases 61 - 70 of 104
Hampton v. Wetzel
as 1:2014cv01367
Plaintiff:
Shawn Hampton
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Mariosa Lamas, Jeffery Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Norwood et al
as 1:2014cv01326
Plaintiff:
Marc Erick Barrett
Defendant:
J. Norwood, Robert Womeldorf, Bergon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WRIGHT v. WENEROWICZ
as 2:2014cv00245
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L. WRIGHT, III
Defendant:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, C.O. GRAHAM, C.O. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REAVES v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2013cv01773
Plaintiff:
REGINALD REAVES
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL, JEFFREY A. BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POTTS v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2013cv05164
Plaintiff:
JIMMY POTTS
Defendant:
EDWARD MCFADDEN , RON PHILLIPS , WALTER REED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Anesburg et al
as 1:2013cv01621
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Anesburg, Mary McCollum, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAHAM v. MARCELLINO et al
as 2:2013cv02785
Petitioner:
SHAROD T. GRAHAM
Respondent:
PETER F. MARCELLINO, GAIL FAIRMAN, MILTON BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maxton v. Thomas et al
as 1:2013cv01134
Plaintiff:
Theron Johnny Maxton
Defendant:
J.E. Thomas, Eric Holder, Charles Samuel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BEAL v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY PA et al
as 2:2013cv00595
Plaintiff:
DAVID E. BEAL
Defendant:
WESTMORELAND COUNTY PA, WESTMORELAND COUNTY PRISON, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAHAM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2013cv01988
Plaintiff:
GREGORY GRAHAM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
