Cases 71 - 80 of 352
KAETZ v. UNKNOWN U.S. MARSHALS et al
as 2:2021cv00062
Defendant:
UNKNOWN U.S. MARSHALS, MATTHEW A. HOHMAN, CLAIR CECCHI and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MARSHALL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv15090
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
Andracos Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HURLEY v. GONZALES et al
as 3:2020cv14748
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER HURLEY
Defendant:
J. GONZALES and D. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLY v. UNITED STATES et al.
as 1:2020cv13962
Plaintiff:
Toni Fly, Tony Fly, Toniya Fly and others
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DEFENDANT, Joint Prisoner Transport Systems, U.S. Public Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cupp, et al v. County of Lycoming et al
as 3:2020cv01784
Defendant:
County of Lycoming, Jennifer Mull, Christopher J. Ebner and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Cupp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRESPO v. MASORTI & SULLIVAN, P.C. et al
as 3:2020cv00101
Defendant:
LANCE MARSHALL, PHILIP M. MASORTI and MASORTI & SULLIVAN, P.C.
Plaintiff:
BARRY LEE CRESPO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BANKS v. JUSTICES OF THE PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT et al
as 2:2020cv00590
Respondent:
TODD, BAER, DOUGHERTY and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Justices of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court et al
as 1:2020cv00660
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Supreme Court, Warden Allegheny County Jail, Hon. Dougherty and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS V TURKEY ET AL
as 2:2020cv00453
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER, SYRIA, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. FITZGERALD et al
as 2:2020cv00441
Respondent:
RICH FITZGERALD, ORLANDO HARPER, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
