Cases 71 - 80 of 180
PETERSON v. KORSNICK et al
as 2:2016cv05289
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER PETERSON
Defendant:
JOE KORSNICK , CAROL BOWSER , JACKIE WOODS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. STANISH et al
as 2:2016cv05053
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN ELITE BAILEY
Defendant:
STANISH and C.O.'S WORKING MEDICAL DEPARTMENT AT S.C.I. DALLAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRISON v. SCI FOREST MEDICAL DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2016cv00224
Plaintiff:
JAMES CURTIS HARRISON
Defendant:
SCI FOREST MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and KIM SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEMP v. SCI-GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2016cv01609
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL JERMAINE KEMP
Defendant:
SCI-GRATERFORD and MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEREZ v. BERKS COUNTY PRISON et al
as 5:2016cv01488
Plaintiff:
DAVID LUIS PEREZ
Defendant:
BERKS COUNTY PRISON, BAUERLE, PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. KANE et al
as 1:2016cv00031
Plaintiff:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant:
KATHLEEN G. KANE, SCI PITTSBURGH MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and EX WARDEN OF SCI PITTSBURGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOPER v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2016cv00549
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY L. COOPER
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, FRANK GREEN, GRIFFITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buckner v. Warden & Medical Department Administration et al
as 3:2016cv00163
Plaintiff:
Elliott Buckner
Defendant:
Warden & Medical Department Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reichart v. Luzerne County Facility's Medical Department et al
as 3:2016cv00131
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Reichart
Defendant:
Luzerne County Facility's Medical Department, CCS Correct Care Solutions, Glenda Buyo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LYTLE v. THE MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
as 5:2016cv00185
Plaintiff:
DALTON J. LYTLE
Defendant:
THE MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
