Cases 81 - 90 of 230
YOUNG v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2017cv03039
Petitioner:
JEROME LAMAR YOUNG
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HUNT v. ORTIZ et al
as 2:2017cv02656
Plaintiff:
LAMAR HUNT
Defendant:
ALFARO ORTIZ , CHARLES GREEN , ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPURILL v. TRITT et al
as 2:2017cv00201
Petitioner:
LAMAR TYREE SPURILL
Respondent:
BRENDA TRITT, R. SETH WILLIAMS and KATHLEEN G. KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spurill v. Tritt et al
as 1:2017cv00048
Petitioner:
Lamar Tyree Spurill
Respondent:
Brenda Tritt, R. Seth Williams and Kathleen G. Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ZAMICHIELI v. MOONEY et al
as 2:2016cv06325
Petitioner:
LAMAR L. ZAMICHIELI
Respondent:
VINCENT MOONEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, PA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROWN v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv08630
Plaintiff:
JODON LAMAR BROWN
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TIDWELL v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2016cv08350
Petitioner:
LAMAR TIDWELL
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and JOHN POWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LEE v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECITONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv07807
Plaintiff:
WALDEN LAMAR LEE
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECITONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07756
Plaintiff:
LAMAR WALKER
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv07679
Plaintiff:
LAMAR D. SMITH
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
