Cases 81 - 90 of 447
BAKER v. CROOKUS et al
as 2:2021cv04615
Plaintiff:
KEEGAN GABRIEL BAKER
Defendant:
CO' CROOKUS, CO' STRAWTHER, SGT. STEWART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRIS v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01338
Plaintiff:
DEREYK L MORRIS and DEREYK L. MORRIS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL ZAKEN, DEPUTY STEPHEN BUZAS, CAPTAIN KENNEDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
OLMO v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv04333
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL OLMO
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT TAMMY FERGUSON, WELLPATH, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Houser et al
as 3:2021cv01887
Petitioner:
Emanuel Rivera
Respondent:
Morris L. Houser, Josh Shapiro and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BELL v. HOUSER et al
as 1:2021cv00292
Petitioner:
CARL EDWARD BELL
Respondent:
MORRIS HOUSER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garrus v. Houser et al
as 4:2021cv01580
Petitioner:
Nakia William Garrus
Respondent:
Morris Houser, Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ORTIZ v. P.I.C.C.
as 2:2021cv03813
Plaintiff:
ANDY ORTIZ
Defendant:
P.I.C.C., C/O: GIBSON, C/O: BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Houser et al
as 3:2021cv01438
Plaintiff:
Curtis Thomas
Defendant:
Morris Houser, Louis Folino, Sgt. Kleno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEUTSCH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00915
Petitioner:
JAMES DEUTSCH
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MORRIS HOUSER and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BEAVER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CARSON v. HOUSER et al
as 1:2021cv00178
Petitioner:
DAWAUN DUPREE CARSON
Respondent:
MORRIS HOUSER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
