Cases 1 - 10 of 50,348
Tiburcio v. ADAMS
as 5:2024cv02617
Petitioner:
Juan Tiburcio
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT MELINDA ADAMS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Carrera II v. Mason et al
as 3:2024cv00986
Petitioner:
Alfred C. Carrera II
Respondent:
Bernadette Mason and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IN RE: MATTHEW ALWARD
as 3:2024cv00983
Plaintiff:
Matthew Alward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BERENATO v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA
as 2:2024cv02609
Petitioner:
DAVID M. BERENATO
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRAYBOY v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2024cv02604
Plaintiff:
RODRICK MAURICE BRAYBOY
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and ATTORNEY GENERAL GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURTIS v. LEHIGH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2024cv02602
Plaintiff:
KEYONTAE D. CURTIS
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. VANATA et al
as 2:2024cv00864
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN LANE
Defendant:
BRIANNA C. VANATA, DAVID RUSSO and MATTHEW RUCINSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SERFASS v. JAMES et al
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
JAMES SERFASS
Defendant:
CASEY JAMES, DEANNA DELLATORRED, PATRICK NAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibbs v. Prime Care Medical
as 1:2024cv00976
Plaintiff:
Christine Gibbs
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. HENDERSON et al
as 2:2024cv02599
Plaintiff:
TRAY ROBINSON
Defendant:
HENDERSON, LOVE, KOSHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
