Cases 1 - 10 of 25
POSLIGUA v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2023cv22337
Petitioner:
MANUEL ALBEY CASTRO POSLIGUA
Respondent:
MRS. S. THOMPSON, JENNIFER ORDONEZ and A. ACEVEDO-SOTO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Acevedo v. Walter
as 3:2023cv00889
Plaintiff:
Alberto Acevedo
Defendant:
A.M. Walter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acevedo v. USA
as 1:2023cv00734
Petitioner:
Matthew Jeremy Acevedo
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Acevedo v. Brittain et al
as 3:2023cv00546
Plaintiff:
Alberto Acevedo
Defendant:
Kathy Brittain, A.M. Walter and N.J. Forte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOHR v. PENCHISHEN et al
as 5:2022cv03458
Petitioner:
PATRICK MOHR
Respondent:
DAVID PENCHISHEN, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, MICHAEL ACEVEDO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hinirio v. Acevedo
as 3:2021cv00082
Plaintiff:
Joel Diaz Hinirio
Defendant:
Federico Ducoudray Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Acevedo v. Strickland et al
as 4:2020cv01221
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Probation and Parole, Scott Woolf and Chad Strickland
Plaintiff:
David Joseph Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ACEVEDO v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2018cv10282
Petitioner:
PABLO ACEVEDO
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ACEVEDO v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2017cv12892
Petitioner:
PABLO ACEVEDO
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WARDEN EAST JERSEY STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eunice Husband v. J. Aleman-Acevedo, et al
as 17-1248
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUNICE HUSBAND
Defendant - Appellee:
J. ALEMAN-ACEVEDO, WARDEN LEWISBURG USP, B. TAGGART and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
