Cases 1 - 8 of 8
RODRIGUEZ v. LEHIGH COUNTY JAIL et al
as 5:2023cv05163
Plaintiff:
ANDY RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY JAIL, TIM CARVER and CHRIS MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose v. Monroe County Courthouse et al
as 3:2018cv02396
Defendant:
Sgt Viera, District Attorney E. Davis Christine, Michael Mancuso and others
Plaintiff:
Devine Rose and Steven Love Lundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gerber v. Asure et al
as 1:2015cv01492
Plaintiff:
Richard Gerber
Defendant:
Donna Asure, William Carver, Garry Haidle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARVER v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2015cv00178
Petitioner:
BLAINE CARVER
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CARVER v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2015cv00026
Petitioner:
BLAINE CARVER
Respondent:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KATHLEEN KANE, JOHN WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boomer v. Chief Director for US Marshals Jhon Doe for the Pennsylvania Station Middle District et al
as 3:2011cv00418
Plaintiff:
Rodney Boomer
Defendant:
Chief Director for US Marshals Jhon Doe for the Pennsylvania Station Middle District, Craig Lowe, Romance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CARVER v. BRITTON et al
as 2:2008cv01299
Respondent:
RANDALL E. BRITTON, TOM CORBETT and STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA, JR.
Petitioner:
ARNOLD SEBASTION CARVER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SMITH v. CARVER et al
as 2:2007cv00575
Plaintiff:
WAYNE SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
TIM CARVER, DALE MEISEL, KELLY ERICH and others
Cross Claimant:
TIM CARVER, DALE MEISEL, TIM CARVER and others
Cross Defendant:
KELLY ERICH, PRIME-CARE HEALTH SERVICES, KELLY ERICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
