Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Derrick Chapman v. Warden Schuylkill FCI
as 24-1944
Petitioner:
DERRICK DEANDRE CHAPMAN
Respondent:
WARDEN SCHUYLKILL FCI
Ronald Chapman v. Superintendent Phoenix SCI, et al
as 23-2676
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD CHAPMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
La'Quanta Chapman v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 23-2627
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LA'QUANTA CHAPMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY CHESTER COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and others
Chapman v. Rickard
as 4:2023cv01246
Petitioner:
Derrick Deandre Chapman
Respondent:
Warden Rickard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Christopher Mbewe v. Theresa Delbalso, et al
as 23-2054
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER F. MBEWE
Defendant / Appellee:
THERESA DELBALSO, Former Superintendent, MICHAEL J. DUNKLE, C.O. CRAWFORD and others
Mbewe v. DelBalso et al
as 4:2021cv00654
Plaintiff:
Christopher F. Mbewe
Defendant:
Michael J. Dunkle, C.O. Crawford, Theresa A. DelBalso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Hartman et al
as 3:2021cv00401
Defendant:
Barry Karwowski, Harold Kertes, John Battenberg and others
Plaintiff:
James T. Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOUSSANT EL v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2020cv09447
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Petitioner:
GENEI TOUSSANT EL and GENEI CHAPMAN TOUSSANT EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Webb v. Chapman et al
as 1:2020cv00270
Plaintiff:
William J. Webb, Jr.
Defendant:
Law Offices of Brian J. Chapman and Brian J. Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Valentine, et al
as 3:2020cv00111
Defendant:
C.O. Sundy, C.O. Chapman and C.O. Valentine
Plaintiff:
Quentin Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
