Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Peters v. Joyner et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Donmier Peters
Defendant:
Sgt. Joyner, C.O. Downes, Cpl. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tulowitzky v. Burley et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
William Tulowitzky
Defendant:
Katrina Burley, C/O White, C/O Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joyner v. Hammond et al
as 1:2023cv00953
Plaintiff:
Ramon A. Joyner
Defendant:
Officer Hammond, Officer Luke and Robert May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOYNER v. GREEN
as 2:2023cv03110
Plaintiff:
RODNEY JOYNER
Defendant:
CHARLES GREEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joyner v. Schuylkill Prison et al
as 1:2022cv02034
Plaintiff:
Michael Ernest Lee Joyner, Sr
Defendant:
Schuylkill Prison, Frackville Police Department and Frackvill State Troopers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. GEO RIVERS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 3:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
DARAYA MARSHALL
Defendant:
GEO RIVERS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, ADMINISTRATOR BRICK TRIPP, MR. HINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sturgess v. Joyner
as 1:2022cv00419
Petitioner:
Edison Arthur Sturgess
Respondent:
Hector Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOYNER v. HANSSEN et al
as 3:2020cv16230
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JOYNER
Defendant:
D. HANSSEN and M.C.C.I.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ATWOOD v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2020cv01309
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT MICHEAL ZAKEN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF WESTMORELAND
Petitioner:
LEE JOYNER ATWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joyner v. State of Delaware et al
as 1:2019cv01661
Petitioner:
Ramon A. Joyner
Respondent:
State of Delaware and Attorney General for the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
