Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Hagan v. Tritt et al
as 1:2016cv01738
Plaintiff:
Damont Hagan
Defendant:
Brenda Tritt, Miller, Kovalchik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2016cv00863
Plaintiff:
Arthur Johnson
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Shirley Moore-Smeal, Michael Wenerowicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Couch v. Tritt et al
as 3:2014cv02232
Plaintiff:
Donte Couch
Defendant:
Brenda L. Tritt, Anthony Kovalchik, G. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liddick v. Tritt et al
as 1:2014cv01813
Plaintiff:
Wayne Liddick
Defendant:
Brenda Tritt, Allan Kovalchik, Krah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mutschler v. Tritt et al
as 3:2014cv01611
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Mutschler
Defendant:
Brenda L. Tritt, A. Kovalchik and Sharon Luquis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ravanna Spencer v. Secretary Department of Correc, et al
as 14-2009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAVANNA SPENCER
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROBERT COLLINS, MICHAEL LORADY and others
Jones v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2013cv00311
Plaintiff:
Shawn T Jones
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Kimberly Clark, B. Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horan v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2013cv00140
Plaintiff:
Patrick Horan
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Shirley Moore-Smeal, Robert MacIntyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lonnie Spellman v. Secretary Pennsylvania Departm, et al
as 12-4580
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE SPELLMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DEPUTY COLLINS, FACILITY MANAGER SUPERINTENDENT and others
Washington-El v. Collins et al
as 3:2012cv01979
Plaintiff:
Chris Washington-El
Defendant:
Robert Collins, Anthony Kovalchik, Thomas Derfler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
