Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Atkins v. Hudson County Rehabilitation Center et al
as 2:2023cv01949
Plaintiff:
MARK ATKINS
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY REHABILITATION CENTER and Hudson County Rehabilitation Center Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ATKINS v. HUDSON COUNTY REHABILITATION CENTER et al
as 2:2022cv05780
Petitioner:
MARK ATKINS
Respondent:
HUDSON COUNTY REHABILITATION CENTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ATKINS v. WARDEN OF HUDSON COUNTY REHABILITATION CENTER et al
as 2:2022cv03712
Petitioner:
MARK ATKINS
Respondent:
WARDEN OF HUDSON COUNTY REHABILITATION CENTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DESPOSITO v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2014cv01641
Plaintiff:
SONNY DESPOSITO
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BERGEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, JOHN L. MOLINELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRANDON v. OFFICER SHAWN PHELPS et al
as 3:2012cv06242
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BRANDON
Defendant:
(A.K.F.C.) OFFICER SHAWN PHELPS, (A.K.F.C.) OFFICER MS. ATKINS, (ADMITERTAR) JHON MAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ZARTIN v. BALIGA et al
as 2:2011cv06929
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH T. ZARTIN
Defendant:
RAVI BALIGA, CAROLYN FARRALES, LUNA HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCDOUGALD v. SMITH et al
as 3:2009cv04248
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE MCDOUGALD
Defendant:
M. SMITH, B. PITTMAN and A. ATKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WAHEED v. ATKINS
as 2:2009cv00467
Plaintiff:
BAKIRAH WAHEED
Defendant:
A. ATKINS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BRANDT v. GLADEY et al
as 3:2008cv00984
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRANDT
Defendant:
REED GLADEY, JENNIFER VELEZ, KEVIN MARTONE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
