Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Jermaine Carter v. Colm Connolly, et al
as 24-1952
Defendant:
SHANE TROXLER, COLM F. CONNOLLY and COLLINS J. SEITZ
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE L. CARTER
Carter v. Connolly et al
as 1:2024mc00221
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Colm F. Connolly, Collins Seitz and Shane Troxler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jermaine Carter v. Colm Connolly, et al
as 24-1725
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE L. CARTER
Defendant:
CHIEF JUDGE COLM F. CONNOLLY and COLLINS J. SEITZ
Carter v. Connolly et al
as 1:2024mc00177
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Chief Judge Colm F. Connolly and Collins Seitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00313
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gbeke Awala, et al v. Internationl Court of Justice, et al
as 08-3954
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GBEKE MICHAEL AWALA
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM G. AWALA and NANCEY RIVARD AWALA
Defendant:
INTL CT OF JUSTICE, US DEPT TREASURY, US DEPT DEFENSE and others
Gbeke Awala v. US Embassy Nigeria, et al
as 08-2954
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GBEKE MICHAEL AWALA
Defendant:
US EMBASSY NIGERIA, AMBASSADOR DEPT OF STATE, NIGERIAN MILITARY SER and others
Awala v. International Court of Justice et al
as 1:2008cv00400
Plaintiff:
Gbeke Awala
Defendant:
International Court of Justice, US Department of Treasury, US Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gbeke Awala, et al v. Kimba Wood, et al
as 08-2511
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GBEKE MICHAEL AWALA
Plaintiff:
MOSES H. AWALA and DORCAS C. BROWN
Defendant:
KIMBA WOOD, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, ROSEMARY S. POOLER and others
Gbeke Awala v. Thomas Hardiman, et al
as 08-2377
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GBEKE MICHAEL AWALA
Defendant:
THOMAS M. HARDIMAN, MICHAEL A CHAGARES, KENT A. JORDAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
