Cases 1 - 10 of 11
EASTERLING v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv07526
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO B. EASTERLING
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EASTERLING v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv07247
Plaintiff:
LONNIE EASTERLING
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EASTERLING v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06972
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JERMAINE EASTERLING
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EASTERLING v. THE CITY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2016cv04463
Plaintiff:
DONALD EASTERLING
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY, THE NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, RICHARD PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EASTERLING v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv02027
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN EASTERLING
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
POPADINETS et al v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 2:2011cv01589
Petitioner:
YOURI POPADINETS and LEBOV CHUPRINA
Respondent:
JANET NAPOLITANO, JOHN T. MORTON, RIEFKOHL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BREA v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008cv01893
Petitioner:
ANTONIO D. SANTOS BREA
Respondent:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, GARY E. MEAD and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SUMBUNDU v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv00313
Petitioner:
DAWUDA SUMBUNDU
Respondent:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, J EASTERLING and SCOTT WEBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv04811
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CHEN v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv01557
Petitioner:
XUE YONG CHEN
Respondent:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, SCOTT WEBER, J EASTERLING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
