Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Tysheed Davis v. United States Marines, et al
as 23-1606
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYSHEED DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARINES, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES MARINES et al
as 2:2022cv04541
Plaintiff:
TYSHEED RASHON DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARINES, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, POLICE DEPARTMENT, FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2020cv12726
Defendant:
CHARLES ELLIS, WELLS FARGO CENTER and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Plaintiff:
WENDELL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUTCHINS v. WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE
as 2:2012cv05277
Plaintiff:
JEAN HUTCHINS
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-4111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
NIN EL AMEEN BEY et al v. STUMPF et al
as 1:2011cv05684
Plaintiff:
NIN EL AMEEN BEY, KAMIYLAH A. EL AMEEN BEY and ELOHA N. EL AMEEN BEY
Defendant:
JOHN STUMPF, MARK C. OMAN, WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Kissi v. Pramco II, et al
as 09-3281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID KISSI
Defendant - Appellee:
PRAMCO II, DLA PIPER, of MD and NY, VENABLE LLP, of MD and NY and others
David Kissi v. Pramco II, et al
as 09-1685
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID KISSI
Defendant - Appellee:
PRAMCO II, DLA PIPER, of MD and NY, VENABLE LLP, of MD and NY and others
Kissi v. Pramco II LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00133
Plaintiff:
David Kissi
Defendant:
Pramco II LLC, DLA Piper, Venable LLP and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kissi v. Pramco II LLC et al
as 1:2008cv00833
Plaintiff:
David Kissi
Defendant:
Pramco II LLC, DLA Piper, Venable LLP and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
