Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Wallace Mitchell v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 21-3355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director-Bureau of Prisons, THOMAS R. KANE, Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator/Bureau of Prisons and others
Mitchell v. Lappin et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Kevin Bittenbender, Mark Preoria, David C. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gorbey v. Gass et al
as 3:2020cv01050
Defendant:
Mr. Gass, Mr. Bohlin, Mr. Marr and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Owl Feather Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gordon v. Buebendorf et al
as 3:2019cv00626
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Gordon
Defendant:
SIS Buebendorf, Gemberling, Edinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
OSORIO v. ROGER et al
as 5:2019cv00041
Defendant:
STEVE NEWMAN, M. NAFF, S. GASS and others
Plaintiff:
WILSON ALBERT OSORIO, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Ebbert et al
as 1:2018cv01965
Defendant:
Officer/Counselor Tharp, Warden Ebbert, SIS Officer Buebendorf and others
Plaintiff:
Terrell Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Diaz v. Ebbert et al
as 1:2016cv01904
Plaintiff:
Juan Diaz, Jr.
Defendant:
David J Ebbert, J.L. Norwood, Ian Connors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gass v. Smith
as 3:2014cv01738
Petitioner:
John A Gass
Respondent:
Richard C Smith and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gass et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2014cv01056
Plaintiff:
John A Gass, Asa Seawood, Talon Griffin and others
Defendant:
Richard C. Smith, Jeffrey Hite, Melanie Gordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derrick Brown v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 09-4490
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, F.B.O.P. Director, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator, D. SCOTT DODRILL, Northeast Regional Director, et al and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
