Cases 1 - 10 of 62
ZAPOLSKI v. GODEK et al
as 1:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R. ZAPOLSKI
Defendant:
TROOPER RONALD GODEK, TROOPER KENT LOUCKS, GREGORY REICHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Barraza
as 3:2023cv00786
Petitioner:
Roger Kent Williams
Respondent:
Warden Barraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
STUBBS v. SKREPENAK et al
as 1:2022cv00940
Plaintiff:
Henry Christopher Stubbs, III
Defendant:
Gregory A. Skrepenak, Todd Vonderheid, Stephen A. Urban and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STUBBS v. SKREPENAK et al
as 2:2022cv00889
Plaintiff:
HENRY CHRISTOPHER STUBBS, III
Defendant:
GREGORY A. SKREPENAK, TODD VONDERHEID, STEPHEN A. URBAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARCIA v. WIND CREEK BETHLEHEM LLC D/B/A WIND CREEK BETHLEHEM et al
as 5:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL GARCIA
Defendant:
WIND CREEK BETHLEHEM LLC doing business as WIND CREEK BETLEHEM, KENT JENKINS, JOHN DOE SECURITY OFFICERS 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. USA
as 4:2019cv01968
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rodger Kent Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. USA
as 4:2019cv01969
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rodger Kent Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DRAYTON v. BERKS COUNTY JAIL SYSTEM et al
as 5:2019cv01265
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL A. DRAYTON, II
Defendant:
MAIL BOOKING PROPERTY DPT, JANINE QUIGLEY, DANIEL VAN BILLIARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLAMER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv01241
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HARRISON, PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY FLAMER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
