Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Myers v. Harry
as 3:2023cv01990
Plaintiff:
Michael Myers
Defendant:
Laur Harry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Folerezell
as 3:2023cv01989
Plaintiff:
Michael Myers
Defendant:
DR. Folerezell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYERS v. HARRY
as 2:2023cv04594
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MYERS
Defendant:
LAUR HARRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYERS v. FOLEREZELL
as 2:2023cv04565
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MYERS
Defendant:
DR. FOLEREZELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: Michael Myers
as 4:2023cv01292
Plaintiff:
Michael Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Myers v. Superintendent Benner Township SCI, et al
as 23-1728
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT BENNER TOWNSHIP SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY BELLEFONTE COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Michael Myers v. Saiqa Mushtaq, et al
as 23-1555
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. SAIQA MUSHTAQ, Psychiatrist -SCI-Camp Hill, MS. GERSON, Psychologist - SCI-Camp Hill, THOMAS, Correction Officer, COI and others
Myers v. Houser et al
as 4:2023cv00475
Petitioner:
Michael Myers
Respondent:
Superintendent Houser, District Attorney of Bellefonte and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Myers v. Mushtaq, et al
as 22-2913
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. SAIQA MUSHTAQ, Psychiatrist - Camp Hill SCI, MS. GERSON, Psychiatrist - SCI Camp Hill, MS. THOMAS, Correction Officer, COI and others
MYERS v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2022cv02720
Petitioner:
MICHAEL MYERS and MICHAEL LEE MYERS
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
