Cases 1 - 10 of 22
KING v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MERCER COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
BRAD KING
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MERCER COUNTY, MAC MCDUFFIE and WILLIAM MCCLURE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McClure v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al

as 1:2023cv01060
Plaintiff:
John McClure
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and USP-Canaan Staff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MEZZACAPPA v. PENCHISHEN et al
as 5:2021cv05093
Plaintiff:
TRICIA MEZZACAPPA
Defendant:
ROBERT PENCHISHEN, KEN KRAFT, JANE/JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MASSAQUOI v. ZAKEN et al

as 2:2021cv01170
Plaintiff:
MANNA MASSAQUOI
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, STEPHEN BUZAS, MAUREEN MALANOSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TATSUKO v. BRODA et al
as 2:2021cv00778
Defendant:
C/O MS. MCCLURE and C/O MR. BRODA
Plaintiff:
ADAM TATSUKO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
McClure, Jr. v. SCI-Pine Grove et al

as 1:2020cv02142
Respondent:
State of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Attorney General Office and Warden of SCI-Pine Grove
Petitioner:
Ricardo B. McClure, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SZILAGYI v. MCCLURE et al

as 5:2020cv05691
Plaintiff:
SCOTT SZILAGYI
Defendant:
SANDY FOSTER MCCLURE, NICHOLAS SZMODIS and ROBERT SHUPP III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ealy, Jr. et al v. Bechtold et al
as 1:2020cv01123
Defendant:
M. Affleck, J. Affleck, Michelle Weller and others
Plaintiff:
Vernon L. Ealy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCLURE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv02655
Plaintiff:
JOHN MCCLURE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HOUSER v. WIDENOUR et al

as 2:2016cv01039
Defendant:
WETZEL, DR. JIN, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
HOUSER and DARIEN HOUSER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.