Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Christopher Hall v. Mark Wahl, et al
as 24-1525
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R. HALL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MARK WAHL, UNIT MANAGER MICHAEL SKUTACK, UNIT MANAGER JOE D'EANGLES and others
Hall v. Wahl et al
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Hall
Defendant:
Mark Wahl, T. McDermott, George M. Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Hall v. Mark Wahl, et al
as 23-2344
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER R. HALL
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MARK WAHL, Superintendent at SCI Waymart, GEORGE LITTLE, Acting Secretary of Corrections and T. MCDERMOTT, Grievance Coordinator
Hall v. Wahl et al
as 3:2023cv00860
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Hall
Defendant:
Superintendent Mark Wahl, T. McDermott and George M. Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARBER v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2013cv02817
Plaintiff:
RONALD BARBER
Defendant:
BRUCE DAVIS, M. HYATT, R. HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. WARE-COOPER et al
as 2:2013cv02429
Plaintiff:
THADDEUS THOMAS
Defendant:
A. WARE-COOPER, M. HYATT, R. HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURNEY v. HYATT et al
as 2:2013cv02263
Plaintiff:
JAMAR BURNEY
Defendant:
M. HYATT, R. HALL, L. HASKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al
as 2:2012cv00169
Petitioner:
JAMES R. HALL
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall v. Department of Corrections
as 1:2011cv01463
Petitioner:
James R. Hall
Respondent:
Department of Corrections and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HALL v. WALSH et al
as 2:2010cv07572
Petitioner:
SHAWN R. HALL
Respondent:
JEROME WALSH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA/YORK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
