Cases 1 - 10 of 63
CORDER v. HARRY et al
as 2:2024cv01303
Defendant:
P. THOMAS, JOHN DOE 1, MR DUBISH and others
Plaintiff:
MANASSEH NASA CORDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Morse v. Harry et al
as 1:2024cv01468
Defendant:
Kathy Brittain, Dr. Laurel R. Harry and Chris Oppman
Plaintiff:
Brandon Morse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. HARRY et al
as 2:2024cv01225
Respondent:
DR.. LAUREL R. HARRY and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Petitioner:
MAURICE BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IN RE: DARREN PAYNE
as 2:2024cv03210
Plaintiff:
DARREN PAYNE
Defendant:
SGT. TIPPY, LOVE, MS. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Posey v. Harry et al
as 3:2024cv01191
Plaintiff:
Ajani Posey
Defendant:
Chris Oppman, Kathy Brittain and Dr. Laurel R. Harry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graziano v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv01084
Defendant:
George Little, James Kehoe, Sgt. Brock and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Graziano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allam, Sr. v. Sutton et al
as 1:2024cv01041
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Allam, Sr.
Defendant:
F. Sutton and Laurel R. Harry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON et al v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00144
Defendant:
DEPUTY R. MARSH, FAYESHALE, REVEREND KLEMMY and others
Plaintiff:
RYCIL WILLIAM, ANTHONY TILLMAN, MICHAEL FIGUEROA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera et al v. Harry et al
as 1:2024cv00858
Plaintiff:
Michael Rivera and Sterlin Reaves
Defendant:
Tammy Ferguson, Laurel R. Harry, Michael Wenerowicz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
FANN v. HARRY et al
as 2:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
GREGORY D. FANN, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr LAUREL R. HARRY, WILLIAM LOWDEN, ERIC ARMEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
