Cases 1 - 10 of 159
KONATA v. RAMOS et al
as 2:2024cv01902
Plaintiff:
MATTHEWS KONATA
Defendant:
RAMOS, ABDUR-RAZZAQ, HOSKINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos-Vargas v. Huntingdon Prison Administration
as 3:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Jose L. Ramos-Vargas
Defendant:
Huntingdon Prison Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RAMOS-VARGAS v. HUNTINGDON PRISON ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
JOSE L. RAMOS-VARGAS
Defendant:
HUNTINGDON PRISON ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CRUZ v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2023cv16879
Plaintiff:
RAMOS M. CRUZ
Defendant:
WARDEN, OFFICER PETTY, OFFICER J.C. DARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. HAMLETT et al
as 2:2023cv15723
Plaintiff:
SAHDIEKHAN JOHNSON
Defendant:
CELESTE HAMLETT, MONICA TYSON, SHALAA CURETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMOS v. VINELAND POLICE DEPT.
as 1:2023cv03501
Plaintiff:
EDWIN LUGO RAMOS
Defendant:
VINELAND POLICE DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Henry et al
as 1:2023cv00677
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Ramos
Defendant:
C/O Henry, Sgt. Edwards, Lt. Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLBERT v. MULROONEY et al
as 2:2023cv00857
Plaintiff:
ASHAN COLBERT
Defendant:
TIM MULROONEY, SGT. DIORIO, SGT. RAMOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAY v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv00846
Plaintiff:
HERBERT GRAY
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN, ESQ., PATRICIA MCGILL, MARC SIM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMOS-VARGAS v. WARD et al
as 2:2022cv04606
Plaintiff:
JOSE L. RAMOS-VARGAS and JOSE L. RAMOS VARGAS
Defendant:
ESQ. ALEXANDER WARD, JUDGE MICHAEL KOURY and ALEXANDER WARD, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
