Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Murphy et al v. Wapinsky et al
as 1:2023cv02116
Plaintiff:
David Murphy, Benjamin Mathis and Ashley Capiga
Defendant:
David Wapinsky, C.O. Donnaly, C.O. Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROACH v. MCKEAN COUNTY et al
as 1:2023cv00182
Plaintiff:
ANNA M. ROACH
Defendant:
MCKEAN COUNTY, WARDEN DANIEL J. WOOD, JOHN/JANE DOE(S) 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Giroux et al
as 1:2015cv01321
Plaintiff:
Troy Adams
Defendant:
Nancy A. Giroux, SCI Albion Security, Linda Traut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROACH v. COLEMAN
as 2:2015cv00658
Petitioner:
SHAKIR ROACH
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROACH v. WALSH
as 2:2013cv07673
Petitioner:
THOMAS ROACH
Respondent:
JEROME WALSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROACH V GIROUX ET AL
as 1:2013cv00251
Petitioner:
LOUIS WILLIAM ROACH
Respondent:
PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL and NANCY GIROUX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roach v. Harlow et al
as 3:2013cv02086
Petitioner:
Louis William Roach
Respondent:
Michael Harlow and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROACH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv03573
Petitioner:
ALFRED ROACH
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
POLITE et al v. RENDELL et al
as 2:2008cv05329
Plaintiff:
WILLIE POLITE, JR., GREGORY STOVER, ALLEN GINN and others
Defendant:
EDWARD G. RENDELL, CATHERINE MCVEY, JEFFREY A. BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. FORD et al
as 2:2008cv03159
Plaintiff:
DANA E. YOUNG, SR.
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. FORD, JAMES B. MARTIN, JANE ROACH and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
